Empirical Study on Path of U.S. University Technology Transfer and Implications

Authors

LUAN Chunjuan, School of Intellectual Property, Dalian University of Technology, Panjin 124221, China

Keywords

university science and technology achievements; transferring path; innovation foster; public procurement; empirical analysis

Document Type

Article

Abstract

It is of great significance for Chinese government to improve university technology transfer by empirically studying the path of U.S. university technology transfer and further exploring U.S. government related legislations & measures and their effects. Results disclose that U.S. university technology transfer follows a path from university to government instead of from university to industry. U.S. government's legislation and measures boosting university technology transfer are summarized and analyzed. Proposals with great influence and impact on Chinese government improving university technology transfer are put forward.

First page

265

Last Page

273

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

潘谷平, 章滢.高校科技成果转化的制约因素及对策探讨.中国科技论坛, 2001, (6):60-64.

Munari F, Sobrero M, Toschi L. Financing technology transfer:assessment of university-oriented proof-of-concept programmes. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2017, 29(2):233-246.

李海健.高校科技成果转化管理制度创新初探.中国高校科技, 2016, (3):70-72.

Silva L C S, Kovaleski J L, Gaia S, et al. The process of technology transfer in Brazilian public universities through technological innovation centers. Interciencia, 2015, 40(10):664-669.

胡罡, 章向宏, 刘薇薇, 等.地方研究院:高校科技成果转化模式新探索.研究与发展管理, 2014, (3):122-128.

周训胜.我国高校科技成果转化模式研究.福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2011, (1):104-107.

Calcagnini G, Favaretto I. Models of university technology transfer:analyses and policies. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2016, 41(4):655-660.

Aceytuno M T, Caceres F R. University-industry technology transfer models in Europe. Revista de Economia Mundial, 2012, (32):215-238.

李晓慧, 贺德方, 彭洁.美国促进科技成果转化的政策.科技导报, 2016, (23):137-142.

张晓东.论推进高校知识产权管理和科技成果转化工作的切入点.中国高校科技, 2016, (4):13-15.

宋河发, 吴博, 吕磊.促进科技成果转化知识产权实施权制度研究.科学学研究, 2016, (9):1319-1325.

Duval-Couetil N, Pilcher J, Weilerstein P, et al. Undergraduate involvement in intellectual property protection at universities:views from technology transfer professionals. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2014, 30(1):60-71.

谷德斌, 毕延彤.高校科技成果转化项目投资风险评估决策支持系统研究.科技管理研究, 2013, (2):81-84.

Gubitta P, Tognazzo A, Destro F. Signaling in academic ventures:the role of technology transfer offices and university funds. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2016, 41(2):368-393.

Grimpe C, Fier H. Informal university technology transfer:a comparison between the United States and Germany. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2010, 35(6):637-650.

管丽丽, 林玉双, 林琛琛.美国哈佛大学科技成果转化收益分配方式解析和借鉴.科技管理研究, 2014, 34(4):29-32.

Tseng A A, Raudensky M. Assessments of technology transfer activities of US universities and associated impact of Bayh-Dole Act. Scientometrics, 2014, 101(3):1851-1869.

Link A N, Siegel D S, Van Fleet D D. Public science and public innovation:Assessing the relationship between patenting at US National Laboratories and the Bayh-Dole Act. Research Policy, 2011, 40(8):1094-1099.

Bozeman B, Link A N. Toward an assessment of impacts from US technology and innovation policies. Science and Public Policy, 2015, 42(3):369-376.

Yee K. America competes act's effect on NASA's education and public outreach programs. Space Policy, 2015, 31:27-30.

Mergel I. Opening Government:Designing open innovation processes to collaborate with external problem solvers. Social Science Computer Review, 2015, 33(5):599-612.

Bush V. Science, the endless frontier: A report to the President. Washington D C: United States Government Printing Office, 1945.

Guerzoni M, Aldridge T T, Audretsch D B, et al. A new industry creation and originality:Insight from the funding sources of university patents. Research Policy, 2014, 43(10):1697-1706.

NIH. Turning discovery into health. [2018-01-16]. https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/what-we-do/nih-turning-discovery-into-health.

Obama B. Presidential memorandum——accelerating technology transfer and commercialization of federal research in support of high-growth businesses. [2018-02-05]. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2011/10/28/presidential-memorandum-accelerating-technology-transfer-and-commerciali.

Pisano G P, Shih W C. Restoring American competitiveness. Harvard Business Review, 2009, 87(7-8):14-26.

Merchant J E. The role of governments in a market economy:future strategies for the high-tech industry in America. International Journal of Production Economics, 1997, 52(1-2):117-131.

Etzkowitz H. From zero-sum to value-added strategies:The emergence of knowledge-based industrial policy in the states of the United States. Policy Studies Journal, 1997, 25(3):412-424.

Doutriaux J. Emerging high-tech firms-how durable are their comparative start-up advantages. Journal of Business Venturing, 1992, 7(4):303-322.

Carlet F. Understanding attitudes toward adoption of green infrastructure:A case study of US municipal officials. Environmental Science & Policy, 2015, 51:65-76.

Reich R B. Government in your business. Harvard Business Review, 2009, 87(7-8):94-100.

Miyazaki K, Islam N. Nanotechnology systems of innovation-An analysis of industry and academia research activities. Technovation, 2007, 27(11):661-675.

Eichler S, Lahner T. Forecast dispersion, dissenting votes, and monetary policy preferences of FOMC members:the role of individual career characteristics and political aspects. Public Choice, 2014, 160(3-4):429-453.

Niosi J. Imitation and innovation new biologics, biosimilars and biobetters. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2017, 29(3):251-262.

OECD. Public procurement. [2018-01-18]. http://www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/public-procurement.htm.

De Clerck D, Demeulemeester E. Creating a more competitive PPP procurement market:game theoretical analysis. Journal of Management in Engineering, 2016, 32 (6):04016015.

Arve M, Martimort D. Dynamic procurement under uncertainty:optimal design and implications for incomplete contracts. American Economic Review, 2016, 106(11):3238-3274.

Keller L R. Multiattribute and intertemporal preferences, probability, and stochastic processes:models and assessment. Decision Analysis, 2011, 8(3):165-169.

Rothwell R. Issues in user producer relations in the innovation process-the role of government. International Journal of Technology Management, 1994, 9(5-7):629-649.

郭爱芳, 周建中.美国政府采购支持技术创新的做法及其借鉴意义.科学学与科学技术管理, 2003, (1):49-51.

Uyarra E, Edler J, Garcia-Estevez J, et al. Barriers to innovation through public procurement:A supplier perspective. Technovation, 2014, 34(10):631-645.

Hellsmark H, Soderholm P. Innovation policies for advanced biorefinery development:key considerations and lessons from Sweden. Biofuels Bioproducts & Biorefining-Biofpr, 2017, 11(1):28-40.

Aschhoff B, Sofka W. Innovation on demand-Can public procurement drive market success of innovations. Research Policy, 2009, 38(8):1235-1247.

Chen A H, Patton D, Kenney M. University technology transfer in China:a literature review and taxonomy. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2016, 41(5):891-929.

Li Y, Zhu C K. Effect of government procurement on technological innovation. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2016, (9):38-44.

Hu K, Cai H Y, Wu Q. Has government procurement in China promoted technological innovation? Journal of Finance and Economics, 2013, 39(9):134-144.

Li Y C, Georghiou L. Signaling and accrediting new technology:Use of procurement for innovation in China. Science and Public Policy, 2016, 43(3):338-351.

Recommended Citation

Chunjuan, LUAN (2018) "Empirical Study on Path of U.S. University Technology Transfer and Implications," Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version): Vol. 33 : Iss. 3 , Article 6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2018.03.006
Available at: https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/journal/vol33/iss3/6