•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

think tank; theoretical research; logical system of think tank research; evaluation criteria

Document Type

Article

Abstract

As an important part of the national decision-making consulting system, theoretical and methodological think-tank research could contribute to improve the level of think tank research, expand the scope of the questions concerned, and effectively exert its role and functions. This paper views think tank research as the object of investigation, and reflects theoretically on the more general role and characteristics, the principles and logic system, the process and methods, and the evaluation criteria of think tank products, which forms a systematic thinking of the logical system of think tank research.

First page

1093

Last Page

1103

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

吕青.从智库研究理论到科技智库建设:专访中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院潘教峰院长.智库理论与实践, 2016, 1(6):2-5.

McGann J. The global 'go-to' think tanks: the leading public policy research organizations in the World. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, 2010.

Madoka N. Introduction//The World Directory of Think-tanks (fourth edition). Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002.

Braun M, Chudnovsky M, Di Nucci C, et al. A comparative study of think tanks in Latin America, Asia and Africa. Buenos Aires: CIPPEC, 2004.

Goodwin C, Nacht M. Beyond government:extending the public policy debate in emerging democracies. Boulder, CO:Westview Press, 1995.

Hashimoto T, Hell S, Nam S W. Public policy research and training in Vietnam. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute, 2006.

Abelson D. Do Think-tanks Matter? Assessing the Impact of Public Policy Institutes. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2009.

Ahmad M. US think tanks and the politics of expertise:role, value and impact. Political Quarterly, 2008, 79(4):529-555.

Hart P, Vromen A. A new era for think tanks in public policy? International trends, Australian realities. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 2008, 67(2):135-148.

Katwala S. Bringing equality back in:the role of a think-tank. Benefits, 2009, 17(1):57-63.

McGann J. Think Tanks and Policy Advice in the US: Academics, Advisors and Advocates. New York: Routledge, 2007.

Weaver K R. The changing world of think-tanks. Political Science and Politics, 1989, 22(3):563-578.

Campbell J, Pedersen O. Knowledge regimes and comparative political economy. American Sociological Association Annual Meeting: Boston MA, 2008.

Plehwe D, Walpen B, Neunhoffer G. Reconsidering neoliberal hegemony//Neoliberal Hegemony: A Global Critique. London: Routledge, 2006: 1-24.

Desai R. Neoliberalism and cultural nationalism//Neoliberal Hegemony: A Global Critique. London: Routledge, 2006: 222-235.

Stone D. Capturing the Political Imagination: Think Tanks and the Policy Process. London: Frank Cass, 1996.

朱旭峰. "思想库"研究:西方研究综述.国外社会科学, 2007, (1):60-69.

潘教峰, 杨国梁, 刘慧晖.智库DIIS理论方法.中国管理科学, 2017, 25(S):1-14.

潘教峰.科技智库研究的DIIS理论方法.中国科学报, 2017-01-09(1).

潘教峰.科技发展不要忘了"为了人"这一初心.中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(6):637-640.

潘教峰.加强智库建设, 推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化——潘教峰研究员访谈.中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(3):297-302.

潘教峰, 杨国梁, 刘慧晖.科技评估DIIS方法.中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(1):68-75.

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS