The Function of Psychology in Social Governance

Authors

Yang Yufang, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Guo Yongyu, School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Ministry of Education, Hubei Human Development and Mental Health Key Laboratory, Wuhan 430079, China

Keywords

psychology; social governance; social science; social responsibility

Document Type

Article

Abstract

A general purpose of deepening its all-round reform is to advance modernization in the state governance system and governance capability. We argue that psychological research can provide important support for this program. On the one hand, owning to its nature of social science, psychology may reveal the mechanisms of many social processes and social issues. On the other hand, the ideas that social governance advocates, including multiple subjects, deliberative democracy, coordinating contradiction and fine governance, are all closely related to psychology and require deeply understanding of people's mind and behavior. Future study should concern about following topics, including intensifying explorations about psychological issues in social governance; focusing on theoretical localization and methodological diversity; keeping on the orientation of multidisciplinary collaborative innovation; dealing with the relationship between basic research and application research, as well as the contradiction between science and humanistic concern.

First page

107

Last Page

116

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

范如国.复杂网络结构范型下的社会治理协同创新.中国社会科学, 2014, (4):98-120.

李宝俊,金彪.全球治理中联合国与非政府组织的关系.现代国际关系, 2008, (3):50-53.

陈振明,薛澜.中国公共管理理论研究的重点领域和主题.中国社会科学, 2007, (3):140-152.

俞可平.全球治理引论.马克思主义与现实, 2002, (1):20-32.

Verdeyen V, Buggenhout B V. Social Governance:Corporate governance in institutions of social security, welfare and healthcare. International Social Security Review, 2003, 56(2):45-64.

王浦劬.国家治理、政府治理和社会治理的含义及其相互关系.国家行政学院学报, 2014, (3):11-17.

戚学祥,钟红.从社会管理走向社会治理.探索, 2014, (2):66-69.

范如国.复杂性治理:工程学范型与多元化实现机制.中国社会科学, 2015, (10):69-91.

卢建军.社会转型期法律治理的心理基础——转型期社会 "有法律无秩序"的社会心理学解读.兰州大学学报:社会科学版, 2012, 40(3):108-114.

张清娥.社会治理中的心理疏导问题探析.求实, 2015, (5):32-36.

郭永玉.麦独孤策动心理学的贡献.华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2002, 41(5):69-74.

张春兴.现代心理学——现代人研究自身问题的科学.上海:上海人民出版社, 2009.

Kinderman P. Understanding and addressing psychological and social problems:The mediating psychological processes model. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 2009, 55(5):464-470.

Walton G M, Dweck C S. Solving social problems like a psychologist. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2009, 4(1):101-102.

Adnorno T W.权力主义人格.李维,译.杭州:浙江教育出版社, 2002.

Pettigrew T F. In pursuit of three theories:Authoritarianism, relative deprivation, and intergroup contact. Annual Review of Psychology, 2016, 67:1-21.

Steele C M, Aronson J. Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995, 69(5):797-811.

Walton G M, Cohen G L. Stereotype Lift. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2003, 39(5):456-467.

Cohen G L, Garcia J, Apfel N, et al. Reducing the racial achievement gap:A social-psychological intervention. Science, 2006, 313(5791):1307-1310.

Walton G M, Cohen G L. A question of belonging:Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2007, 92(1):82-96.

World bank east Asia and Pacific economic update 2010, volume 2:robust recovery, rising risks. Washington, DC:The World Bank, 2010.

Samaddar R. Government of Peace:Social Governance, Security and the Problematic of Peace. Chalgrove:Ashgate Publishing Ltd., 2015.

赵孟营.从新契约到新秩序:社会治理的现代逻辑.北京大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 2015, (2):106-114.

汪大海,柳亦博.社会冲突的消解与释放:基于冲突治理结构的分析.华东经济管理, 2014, 28(10):105-109.

赵孟营.治理主体意识:现代社会治理的技术基础.中国特色社会主义研究, 2015, (3):82-86.

Ansell C, Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2008, 18(4), 543-571.

王名,蔡志鸿,王春婷.社会共治:多元主体共同治理的实践探索与制度创新.中国行政管理, 2014, (12):16-19.

王重鸣,邓靖松.团队中信任形成的映象决策机制.心理学报, 2007, 39(2):321-327.

Balliet D, Van Lange P A. Trust, conflict, and cooperation:a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 2013, 139(5):1090-1112.

Platow M J, Foddy M, Yamagishi T, et al. Two experimental tests of trust in in-group strangers:The moderating role of common knowledge of group membership. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2012, 42(1):30-35.

Tanis M, Postmes T. A Social identity approach to trust:Interpersonal perception, group membership and trusting behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2005, 35(3):413-424.

辛素飞,明朗,辛自强.群际信任的增进:社会认同与群际接触的方法.心理科学进展, 2013, 21(2):290-299.

李江新.社区管理三大参与主体分析——基于多元共治的视角.学术界, 2011, (5):79-86.

Fishkin J S, Rosell S A, Shepherd D, et al. Choice dialogues and deliberative polls:Two approaches to deliberative democracy. National Civic Review, 2005, 93(4):55-63.

韩福国,张开平.社会治理的"协商"领域与"民主"机制——当下中国基层协商民主的制度特征、实践结构和理论批判.浙江社会科学, 2015, (10):48-61.

Miller D. Deliberative democracy and social choice. Political Studies, 1992, 40(40):54-67.

王俊秀.社会心理理论——一种宏观社会心理学范式.北京:社会科学文献出版社, 2014.

Sunstein C R. Incompletely theorized agreements in constitutional Law. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2007, 74(1):1-24.

姚远,任羽中. "激活"与"吸纳"的互动——走向协商民主的中国社会治理模式.北京大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 2013, 50(2):141-146.

Lee E J. When and how does depersonalization increase conformity to group norms in computer-mediated communication? Communication Research, 2006, 33:423-447.

贾玉娇.从社会管理到社会治理:现代国家治理能力提升路径研究.吉林大学社会科学学报, 2015, (4):99-107.

马怀德.预防化解社会矛盾的治本之策:规范公权力.中国法学, 2012, (2):45-53.

刘霞.多元社会的稳定逻辑——论转型期社会矛盾化解的协同治理机制构建.人民论坛·学术前沿, 2013, (1):74-83.

罗依平,凌常月.公共治理视角下的社会矛盾化解机制研究.理论探讨, 2015, (1):132-135.

欧阳瑜华,刘海燕.社会治理视角下的社会心态优化.经济研究参考, 2015, (45):49-53.

王俊秀.社会心态:转型社会的社会心理研究.社会学研究, 2014, (1):104-124.

杨宜音.个体与宏观社会的心理关系:社会心态概念的界定.社会学研究, 2006, (4):117-131.

王俊秀.当前值得注意的社会心态问题和倾向.中国党政干部论坛, 2015, (5):11-15.

杨宜音. 2015社会心态新特征.人民论坛, 2016, (4):78-80.

朱力,朱志玲.当前社会心态的特点及变化趋势.人民论坛, 2015, (36):16-20.

胡颖廉,李楠.社会治理精细化:背景、内涵和路径——党的十八届五中全会学习研讨会观点综述.行政管理改革, 2016, (2):64-66.

陆志孟,于立平.提升社会治理精细化水平的目标导向与路径分析.领导科学, 2014, (9):14-17.

Piche D. World development report 2015:mind, society, and behavior. Canadian Journal of Development Studies-Revue Canadienne D Etudes Du Developpement. 2015, 36(4):575-578.

Dupas P, Robinson J. Why don't the poor save more? Evidence from health savings experiments. American Economic Review, 2011, 103(4):1138-1171.

Haushofer J, Fehr E. On the psychology of poverty. Science, 2014, 344(6186):862-867.

Bettinger E P, Long B T, Oreopoulos P, et al. The role of application assistance and information in college decisions:Results from the H & R Block FAFSA Experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2012, 127(3):1205-1242.

Barrera-Osorio F, Bertrand M, Linden L L, et al. Improving the design of conditional transfer programs:Evidence from a randomized education experiment in Colombia. American Economic Journal:Applied Economics, 2011, 3(2):167-195.

喻国明.大数据分析下的中国社会舆情:总体态势与结构性特征——基于百度热搜词(2009-2012)的舆情模型构建.中国人民大学学报, 2013, 27(5):2-9.

胡春花,陈晓梅,陈仕鸿.虚拟现实技术在儿童室内火灾逃生教育中的应用研究.系统仿真学报, 2016, 28(4):934-939.

王建明,王俊豪.公众低碳消费模式的影响因素模型与政府管制政策——基于扎根理论的一个探索性研究.管理世界, 2011, (4):58-68.

冯婕,曾开富,白维,等.提高学术治理能力推进跨学科协同创新.中国高等教育, 2014, (7):59-61.

赵孟营.社会治理精细化:从微观视野转向宏观视野.中国特色社会主义研究, 2016, (1):78-83.

Recommended Citation

Yufang, Yang and Yongyu, Guo (2017) "The Function of Psychology in Social Governance," Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version): Vol. 32 : Iss. 2 , Article 1.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.2017.02.001
Available at: https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/journal/vol32/iss2/1