•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

collective action; rural commons; science and technology progress; institutional innovation; rural governance

Document Type

Article

Abstract

It is of great significance to promote agricultural supply-side reform through science and technology progress. This paper introduces the perspective of collective action, to provide enlightenments for understanding how to promote agricultural technological progress. The decline of collective action in rural commons governance and public goods provision is a major obstacle for technological progress, especially for the diffusion of collective technology. The dilemma of rural collective action can be attributed to ten factors. Meanwhile, there are four major factors conducive to rural collective action. To break the rural collective action dilemma and accelerate agricultural technological progress, it is necessary to enhance the capacity of rural collective action adopting an overall perspective. The policy implications of this analysis include the follows:empowering grassroots autonomy, governance capacity and the construction of public service system; developing actively professional services of agricultural production and rural cooperation governance; promoting the E-commerce and E-government in rural areas; strengthening the construction of rural culture, democracy and the rule of law; deepening the reform of rural collective property rights system, and enhancing institutional innovation in accordance with local conditions.

First page

1096

Last Page

1102

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

司徒淞, 王和洲, 张薇. 中国水稻节水若干问题的探讨与建议. 2000, 19(1): 30-33.

王亚华.中国农业灌溉管理的挑战与对策. "三农"决策要参, 2017, 188(12):1-12.

王亚华, 高瑞, 孟庆国.中国农村公共事务治理的危机与响应.清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2016, (2):23-29.

姚林, 郑华斌, 刘建霞, 等.中国水稻节水灌溉技术的现状及发展趋势.生态学杂志, 2014, 33(5):1381-1387.

俞双恩, 张展羽.江苏省水稻高产节水灌溉技术体系研究.河海大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 30(6):30-34.

王亚华.对制度分析与发展(IAD)框架的再评估.公共管理评论, 2017, (1):3-21.

Wang Y, Chen C, Araral E. The effects of migration on collective action in the commons:Evidence from rural China. World Development, 2016, 88:79-93.

高瑞, 王亚华, 陈春良.劳动力外流与农村公共事务治理.中国人口·资源与环境, 2016, 26(2):84-92.

王亚华, 汪训佑.中国渠系灌溉管理绩效及其影响因素.公共管理评论, 2014, 16(2):47-68.

王亚华.中国用水户协会改革:政策执行视角的审视.管理世界, 2013, (6):61-71.

Agrawal A. Common Resources and Institutional Sustainability. Washington, DC:National Academy Press, 2002.

Araral E. What explains collective action in the commons? Theory and evidence from the Philippines. World Development, 2009, 37(3):687-697.

Meinzen-Dick R S, Brown L R, Feldstein H S, et al. Gender, property rights, and natural resources. World Development, 1997, 25(8):1303-1315.

Dillon A. The effect of irrigation on poverty reduction, asset accumulation, and informal insurance:Evidence from Northern Mali. World Development, 2011, 39(12):2165-2175.

陈锡文, 韩俊.中国农业供给侧改革研究.北京:清华大学出版社, 2017.

Ostrom E. Governing the commons:The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1990.

Agrawal A, Gibson C C. Enchantment and disenchantment:The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 1999, 27(4):629-649.

贺雪峰.取消农业税后农村的阶层及其分析.社会科学, 2011, (3):70-79.

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS