U.S.-Europe artificial intelligence regulatory cooperation, divergence, and China's "window of opportunity" for strategic Breakthrough

Authors

Yang MEI, The Institute for International Affairs, Qianhai, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518172, ChinaFollow
Jing ZENG, Business School, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China
Yong ZHAN, Business School, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, ChinaFollow

Keywords

artificial intelligence (AI); supervision; technological; "window of opportunity"; China's proposal

Document Type

Artificial Intelligence and Future Society

Abstract

The United States, Europe, and China have adopted completely different technological development paths in the era of artificial intelligence innovation, forming a model division of "development-driven governance", "stringent governance framework", and "coordinated governance model" The United States and Europe have respectively set strategic goals as "maintaining technological hegemony" and "competing for the soft power of international rules", forming an interactive model in which institutional supervision and industry independence parallel, and cooperation needs and policy divergence coexist. China has contributed a unique technological governance logic of "people-oriented" and "moral-oriented". Faced with the current technological "window of opportunity", China should adopt two paths: reshaping the rules and strategic policy innovation, further enhancing its leading position in the development of global technology industries and its dominance in the formulation of international standards.

First page

715

Last Page

724

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 United Nations. Governing AI for Humanity. New York: UN, 2023.

2 贺斌, 李红美, 王周秀, 等. 美国人工智能国家战略行动最 新动向：洞察与借鉴. 情报杂志, 2021, 40(1): 25-32. He B, Li H M, Wang Z X, et al. The latest trends of American artificial intelligence national strategic action plans: Insight and reference. Journal of Intelligence, 2021, 40 (1): 25-32. (in Chinese)

3 戚凯, 崔莹佳, 田燕飞. 美欧英人工智能竞逐及其前景. 现 代国际关系, 2024, (5): 118-139. Qi K, Cui Y J, Tian Y F. The US-EU-UK artificial intelligence race and its prospects. Modern International Relations, 2024, (5): 118-139. (in Chinese)

4 陈凤仙, 连雨璐, 王娜. 欧美人工智能监管模式及政策启 示. 中国行政管理, 2024, (1): 77-88. Chen F X, Lian Y L, Wang N. European and American artificial intelligence regulatory models and policy implications. Chinese Public Administration, 2024, (1): 77- 88. (in Chinese)

5 陈建兵, 王明. 负责任的人工智能：技术伦理危机下 AIGC 的治理基点. 西安交通大学学报（社会科学版）, 2024, 44 (1): 111-120. Chen J B, Wang M. Responsible artificial intelligence: governance fundamentals for AIGC in the ethical crisis of technology. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences Edition), 2024, 44(1): 111-120. (in Chinese)

6 段伟文. 人工智能时代的价值审度与伦理调适. 中国人民 大学学报, 2017, 31(6): 98-108. Duan W W. Value reflection and ethical adjustment in the era of artificial intelligence. Journal of Renmin University of China, 2017, 31(6): 98-108. (in Chinese)

7 刘益灯, 宋歌. DPF 美欧数据跨境流动规则博弈及其镜鉴. 世界经济研究, 2024, (7): 29-42. Liu Y D, Song G. The implications of cross-border data flow between the EU and the U. S. through data privacy framework. World Economic Research, 2024, (7): 29-42. (in Chinese)

8 刘文杰. 美欧数据跨境流动的规则博弈及走向. 国际问题 研究, 2022, (6): 65-78. Liu W J. The US-EU game in making rules of cross-border data flows and its direction. International Studies, 2022, (6): 65-78. (in Chinese)

9 单文华, 邓娜. 欧美跨境数据流动规制：冲突、协调与借鉴 ——基于欧盟法院"隐私盾"无效案的考察. 西安交通大学 学报（社会科学版）, 2021, 41(5): 94-103. Shan W H, Deng N. Conflict, coordination and reference of transborder data flow regulation between the EU and the U. S.: Comment on the "Schrems Ⅱ" of CJEU. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University (Social Sciences), 2021, 41(5): 94-103. (in Chinese)

10 金晶. 欧盟的规则，全球的标准？数据跨境流动监管的"逐 顶竞争". 中外法学, 2023, 35(1): 46-65. Jin J. EU rules, global standards? The "Race to the Top" in the regulation of cross-border data flows. Chinese and Foreign Law, 2023, 35(1): 46-65. (in Chinese)

11 Schmidt E. AI, great power competition & national security. Daedalus, 2022, 151(2): 288-298.

12 Perez C, Soete L. Catching up in technology: Entry barriers and windows of opportunity. Technical Change and Economic Theory, 1988, 14(2): 458-479.

13 Lee K, Malerba F. Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership: Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems. Research Policy, 2017, 46(2): 338-351.

14 彭中礼, 刘世杰. 从"特殊性"到"去特殊性"——人工智能 法律规制路径审视. 济南大学学报（社会科学版）, 2019, 29 (4): 29-42. Peng Z L, Liu S J. From "Speciality" to "De-Speciality" — Artificial intelligence legal regulation path review. Journal of University of Jinan (Social Sciences), 2019, 29(4): 29-42. (in Chinese)

15 吴汉东. 人工智能时代的制度安排与法律规制. 法律科学 （西北政法大学学报）, 2017, 35(5): 128-136. Wu H D. Institutional arrangements and legal regulation in age of artificial intelligence. Science of Law (Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law), 2017, 35 (5): 128-136. (in Chinese)

16 张富利. 全球风险社会下人工智能的治理之道——复杂性 范式与法律应对. 学术论坛, 2019, 42(3): 68-80. Zhang F L. The governance of artificial intelligence in the global risk society—Complexity paradigm and legal response. Academic Forum, 2019, 42(3): 68-80. (in Chinese)

Recommended Citation

MEI, Yang; ZENG, Jing; and ZHAN, Yong (2024) "U.S.-Europe artificial intelligence regulatory cooperation, divergence, and China's "window of opportunity" for strategic Breakthrough," Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version): Vol. 40 : Iss. 4 , Article 15.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20241210001
Available at: https://bulletinofcas.researchcommons.org/journal/vol40/iss4/15