•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

artificial intelligence; global governance; competition; cooperation; sustainable development

Document Type

Artificial Intelligence and Future Society

Abstract

In the context of great power competition and escalating geopolitical conflicts, the academic community generally holds a pessimistic view of AI international cooperation, believing that the space is shrinking. This perception mainly stems from conflicts in the cross-border supervision of AI data and algorithms among technologically advanced countries, while overlooking the strong willingness and potential for cooperation in energy conservation and emission reduction through AI technologies shown by Global South countries. Looking into the future of global governance, China, starting from leading the transformation of AI technologies, shall take lead in supporting these countries to transform the sustainable development consensus reached at the Paris AI Action Summit into concrete action plans.

First page

706

Last Page

714

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 薛澜, 赵静. 人工智能国际治理：基于技术特性与议题属性 的分析. 国际经济评论, 2024, (3): 52-69. Xue L, Zhao J. International governance of AI: Analysis based on technical characteristics and issue attributes. International Economic Review, 2024(3): 52-69. (in Chinese)

2 沈逸, 高瑜. 大国竞争背景下的人工智能安全治理与战略 稳定. 国际展望, 2024, 16(3): 33-50. Shen Y, Gao Y. Artificial intelligence security governance and strategic stability in the context of great power competition. Global Review, 2024, 16(3): 33-50. (in Chinese)

3 张磊. 人工智能国际规则博弈态势、共识分歧与中国"话语 势能"建构. 新疆社会科学. 2024, (4): 119-133. Zhang L. The game situation and consensus differences in AI international rules and the construction of China's "discourse potential". Xinjiang Social Sciences, 2024, (4): 119-133. (in Chinese)

4 Lewin S. Mapping global AI governance: A nascent regime in a fragmented landscape. AI and Ethics, 2022(2): 303-314.

5 韩娜, 董小宇. 全球人工智能安全治理的信任困境与破解 路径. 国际论坛, 2024, 26(6): 3-23. Han N, Dong X Y. The trust dilemma and crack path of global artificial intelligence security governance. International Forum, 2024, 26(6): 3-23. (in Chinese)

6 苏可桢, 沈伟. 欧盟人工智能治理方案会产生"布鲁塞尔效 应"吗?——基于欧盟《人工智能法》的分析. 德国研究, 2024, 29(2): 66-88. Su K Z, Shen W. Will the EU's AI governance plan have a "Brussels effect"?. Analysis based on the EU's Artificial Intelligence Act. Deutschland Studien, 2024, 29(2): 66-88. (in Chinese)

7 施锦诚, 王国豫, 王迎春. ESG 视角下人工智能大模型风险 识别与治理模型. 中国科学院院刊, 2024, 39(11): 1845- 1859. Shi J C, Wang G Y, Wang Y C. Artificial intelligence foundation model risk identification and governance model from the ESG perspective. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2024, 39(11): 1845-1859. (in Chinese)

8 王夏晖. 人工智能：加速形成生态环境治理新模式. 环境保 护, 2024, 52(15): 39-44. Wang X H. Artificial intelligence: Accelerating the formation of new environmental governance models. Environmental Protection, 2024, 52(15): 39-44. (in Chinese)

9 Yu Y, Wang J H, Liu Y. et al. Revisit the environmental impact of artificial intelligence: The overlooked carbon emission source?. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2024, 18(12): 158.

10 陈晓红, 曹廖滢, 陈姣龙, 等. 我国算力发展的需求、电力能 耗及绿色低碳转型对策. 中国科学院院刊, 2024, 39(3): 528-539. Chen X H, Cao L Y, Chen J L, et al. Development demand, power energy consumption and green and low-carbon transition for computing power in China. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2024, 39(3): 528-539. (in Chinese)

11 王天凡. 人工智能监管的路径选择——欧盟《人工智能法》 的范式、争议及影响. 欧洲研究, 2024(3): 1-30. Wang T F. The path choice of AI regulation: The paradigm, controversy and influence of EU AI Act. European Studies, 2024(3): 1-30. (in Chinese)

12 郭梦迎, 张薇薇. 欧盟人工智能发展与治理面临的机遇和 挑战. 和平与发展, 2024, (5): 50-76. Guo M Y, Zhang W W. The opportunities and challenges faced with the development and governance of artificial intelligence in the European union. Peace and Development, 2024, (5): 50-76. (in Chinese)

13 Philipp H. Sustainable AI Regulation. Common Market Law Review. 2024, 61(4): 345-386.

14 朱明婷, 徐崇利. 人工智能伦理的国际软法之治：现状、挑 战与对策. 中国科学院院刊, 2023, 38(7): 1037-1049. Zhu M T, Xu C L. International soft law governance of artificial intelligence ethics: Current situation, challenges and countermeasures. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2023, 38(7): 1037-1049. (in Chinese)

15 武琼. 科技向善：中国全球人工智能治理倡议的核心要义 与理论价值. 和平与发展, 2024, (5): 25-49. Wu Q. Technology for good: The core principles and theoretical value of China's global AI governance initiative. Peace and Development, 2024, (5): 25-49. (in Chinese)

16 Verdegem P. Dismantling AI capitalism: The commons as an alternative to the power concentration of Big Tech. AI & Society, 2024, 39(2): 727-737.

17 Tallberg J, Erman E, Furendal M, et al. The global governance of artificial intelligence: Next steps for empirical and normative research. International Studies Review, 2023, 25(3): viad040.

18 张薇薇. 美国的人工智能算法治理：理念、举措及影响. 当 代美国评论, 2024, 8(3): 108-127. Zhang W W. U. S. AI algorithmic governance: Principles, measures, and implications. Contemporary American Review, 2024, 8(3): 108-127. (in Chinese)

19 张东冬. 三大全球倡议与人工智能全球治理的新理路. 俄 罗斯东欧中亚研究, 2024(4): 1-21. Zhang D D. The three global initiatives and a new approach to global governance of artificial intelligence. Russian, East European & Central Asian Studies, 2024, (4): 1-21. (in Chinese)

20 吴志成, 王尹泽". 全球南方"崛起与全球治理发展. 国外理 论动态, 2024, (4): 110-119. Wu Z C, Wang Y Z. The rise of the Global South and the change in global governance system. Foreign Theoretical Trends, 2024, (4): 110-119. (in Chinese)

21 赵骏, 李婉贞. 人工智能对国际法的挑战及其应对. 浙江大 学学报（人文社会科学版）, 2020, 50(2): 10-25. Zhao J, Li W Z. The challenges of artificial intelligence on international law and reaction. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2020, 50(2): 10-25. (in Chinese)

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS