•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

digital civilization era; science and technology; self-reliance; engineering ecology

Document Type

Strategy & Policy Decision Research

Abstract

In the digital civilization era, scientific and technological innovation has emerged as a crucial pathway to unleash new quality productive forces and spearhead the ascendancy of great powers. It has become a vital pillar for major nations to engage in international competition and reshape the global order. Furthermore, it acts as a key instrument to smooth out economic cycles and overcome the limitations imposed by these cycles. The rise model, marked by advanced scientific and technological innovation and a commitment to scientific self-sufficiency and enhancement, significantly boosts the viability and acceptance of China’s approach to international governance. At the same time, science and technology innovation in the digital era increasingly emphasizes engineering thinking to promote the organic integration of scientific and technological knowledge and industry. The engineering ecology paradigm provides a new framework for analyzing and researching the process of evolution of industrial change and the mechanism of industrial innovation in industrial change, which can help us understand the incentives for industrial change, the opportunities for creating new industries, adapting to the change and transformation, as well as the process and mechanism of promoting the relevant policy awareness and policy formulation, so that we can understand the incentives for industrial change, create new industries, adapt to change and transformation, and promote the relevant policy awareness and policy formulation. The process and mechanism of policy understanding and policy formulation can accelerate industrial originality, industrial derivation, and industrial upgrading in the digital era. Entering the new era, it is necessary to further cultivate a new paradigm of engineering ecology that will catalyze industrial change, and continuously nurture new kinetic energy that will lead the next scientific and technological revolution and industrial change.

First page

1022

Last Page

1031

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 新华社. 习近平向2021年世界互联网大会乌镇峰会致贺信. 人民日报, 2021-09-27(01).Xinhua News Agency. Xi Jinping sends congratulatory letter to Wuzhen Summit of World Internet Conference 2021. People’s Daily, 2021-09-27(01). (in Chinese)
2 翁士洪. 数字时代治理理论——西方政府治理的新回应及其启示. 经济社会体制比较, 2019, (4): 138-147.Weng S H. The theory of digital era governance: The new response to governance in digital era and its relevance. Comparative Economic & Social Systems, 2019, (4): 138-147. (in Chinese)
3 郎平. 数字时代美国对华科技竞争的特点. 战略决策研究, 2021, 12(3): 85-100.Lang P. US-China tech competition in the digital age. Journal of Strategy and Decision-Making, 2021, 12(3): 85-100. (in Chinese)
4 Muhammad A M. The digital turn in geopolitics: Gojek’s strategy of digital space and its geopolitical implications. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 2020, 19(1): 40-57.
5 Wood G. Geopolitics and the digital domain: How cyberspace is impacting international security. Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection, 2020: 3290.
6 许正中, 行伟波, 梁云燕. 数字时代的大国经济博弈：模式变迁与发展战略. 全球化, 2023, (1): 19-28.Xu Z Z, Xing W B, Liang Y Y. The great power economic game in the digital era: Model changes and development strategies. Globalization, 2023(1): 19-28. (in Chinese)
7 陈元志, 陈劲. 社会主义现代化强国视域下的科技创新：历史演进、内涵特征和实现路径. 上海大学学报（社会科学版）, 2023, 40(3): 1-18.Chen Y Z, Chen J. Scientific and technological innovation in the perspective of building a great modern socialist country: Evolution, characteristics and path. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Sciences Edition), 2023, 40(3): 1-18. (in Chinese)
8 Chen J, Yin X M, Mei L. Holistic innovation: An emerging innovation paradigm. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 2018, 2(1): 1-13.
9 习近平. 论科技自立自强. 北京: 中央文献出版社, 2023.Xi J P. On Scientific and Technological Self-reliance and Self-improvement. Beijing: Central Party Literature Press, 2023. (in Chinese)
10 矫立军. 主权国家经济周期共性分析与经济周期模型创新. 商业时代, 2011, (6): 46-47.Jiao L J. General analysis of economic cycle in sovereign countries and innovation of economic cycle model. Commercial Times, 2011, (6): 46-47. (in Chinese)
11 汤伟钢, 陈慧莉. 技术范式创新周期与经济周期的循环因替关系. 天津大学学报（社会科学版）, 2012, 14(2): 123-127.Tang W G, Chen H L. A feedback loop between technological paradigm innovation cycle and economic cycle. Journal of Tianjin University (Social Sciences), 2012, 14(2): 123-127. (in Chinese)
12 习近平. 关于《中共中央关于坚持和完善中国特色社会主义制度 推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化若干重大问题的决定》的说明. (2019-11-05)[2019-11-05]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-11/05/content_5449035.htm.Xi J P. Explanation on the decision of the central committee of the communist party of China on several major issues concerning adherence to and improvement of the socialist system with Chinese characteristics and advancement of the modernization of the state governance system and governance capability. (2019-11-05)[2019-11-05]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-11/05/content_5449035.htm.(in Chinese)
13 Dawes S S. Governance in the digital age: A research and action framework for an uncertain future. Government Information Quarterly, 2008, 26(2): 257-264.
14 蔡跃洲. 数字经济的国家治理机制——数据驱动的科技创新视角. 北京交通大学学报（社会科学版），2021, 20(2): 39-49.Cai Y Z. State governance mechanism for digital economy: From the perspective of data-driven STI governance transformation. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University (Social Sciences Edition), 2021, 20(2): 39-49. (in Chinese)
15 习近平. 让工程科技造福人类、创造未来. 人民日报, 2014-06-04(02).Xi J P. Let engineering science and Ttechnology benefit human beings and create the future. People’s Daily, 2014-06-04(02). (in Chinese)

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS