•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

breaking "Siwei"; building "new standards"; BRIDGE theory; Six Steps

Document Type

Policy & Management Research

Abstract

How to build "new standards" after breaking "Siwei" is a hot and difficult issue in the current reform of research evaluation, which urgently needs good theoretical and methodological support. In this context, this study puts forward the BRIDGE theory of research evaluation of scientific researchers' achievements, which is to integrate the reasonable elements in the quantitative evaluation based on SCI papers into the "new standard" based on peer review, so as to build a bridge between quantitative analysis and qualitative evaluation. The practical application of BRIDGE theory is expressed as "Six Steps", in which the second step "Recode" and the third step "Insight" are two key steps to achieve hierarchical expert evaluation based on quantitative analysis. BRIDGE theory is an important development of the evaluation method combining quantitative and qualitative analysis, and has a wide application prospect.

First page

1099

Last Page

1107

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 章熙春.我国科技评价体系的困境与优化.学术研究, 2020, (10):38-46.

Zhang X C.Dilemma and optimization of science and technology evaluation system in China.Academic Research, 2020, (10):38-46.(in Chinese)

2 陈云伟, 张志强.科技评价走出""破""与""立""困局的思考与建议.情报学报, 2020, 39(8):796-805.

Chen Y W, Zhang Z Q.Opinions on new science and technology evaluation methods.Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2020, 39(8):796-805.(in Chinese)

3 刘云.破""四唯""能解决中国科技评价的问题症结吗.科学学与科学技术管理, 2020, 41(8):3-6.

Liu Y.Can breaking the ""Four Ideals"" solve the crux of China's science and technology evaluation.Science of Science and Management of S&T, 2020, 41(8):3-6.(in Chinese)

4 孟溦, 张群.科研评价""五唯""何以难破——制度分析的视角.中国高教研究, 2021, (9):51-58.

Meng W, Zhang Q.Why is it difficult to break the ""FiveOnly"" in research evaluation:The perspective of institutional analysis.China Higher Education Research, 2021, (9):51-58.(in Chinese)

5 陈曦, 王延斌.""破四唯""不能一破了之.科技日报, 2021-03-11(04).Chen X, Wang Y B.""Siwei"" cannot be broken at once.Science and Technology Daily, 2021-03-11(04).(in Chinese)

6 俞立平, 张矿伟, 蒋长兵.推进代表作评价存在的问题与对策研究.情报学报, 2021, 40(4):345-353.

Yu L P, Zhang K W, Jiang C B.Promoting the evaluation of representative works:Challenges and recommendations.Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2021, 40(4):345-353.(in Chinese)

7 田贤鹏.高校教师学术代表作制评价实施:动因、挑战与路径.中国高教研究, 2020, (2):85-91.

Tian X P.Evaluation system of academic representative work of university teachers:Agent, challenges and path.China Higher Education Research, 2020, (2):85-91.(in Chinese)

8 李晓轩, 徐芳.""四唯""如何破:中国科学院研究所评价的实践和启示.中国科学院院刊, 2020, 35(12):1431-1438.

Li X X, Xu F.How to break the ""Siwei""?-Practice and enlightenment based on research institute evaluation of Chinese Academy of Sciences.Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2020, 35(12):1431-1438.(in Chinese)

9 潘教峰.""破四唯""和""立新标""并举完善科技人才评价体系.中国科技人才, 2021, (5):2-3.

Pan J F.Improve the research talents' evaluation system by ""breaking Siwei"" and ""establishing new standards"".Science and Technology Talents of China, 2021, (5):2-3.(in Chinese)

10 宋艳辉, 朱李, 邱均平.""破五唯""背景下我国科研评价体系构建的几点思考.情报杂志, 2022, 41(2):190-197.

Song Y H, Zhu L, Qiu J P.Reflections on the construction of scientific research evaluation system under the background of ""Breaking the Five Focuses"".Journal of Intelligence, 2022, 41(2):190-197.(in Chinese)

11 倪思洁.中科院召开全院人才工作会议.中国科学报, 2022-06-30(01).Ni S J.The Chinese Academy of Sciences held a talent work conference.China Science Daily, 2022-06-30(01).(in Chinese)

12 Brookes B C.""Sources of information on specific subjects"" by S.C.Bradford.Journal of Information Science, 1985, 10(4):173-175.

13 Schoenbach U H, Garfield E.Citation indexes for science.Science, 1956, 123:61-62.

14 张鸿翔.以SCI文章作为评估指标局限性的探讨.中国科学院院刊, 2008, 23(6):565-568.

Zhang H X.Discussion on limitation of SCI articles as evaluation indexes.Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2008, 23(6):565-568.(in Chinese)

15 李真真.怎样评价基础科学研究?.中国高校技术市场, 2001, (9):20-21.

Li Z Z.How to evaluate basic scientific research?.China University Science & Technology, 2001, (9):20-21.(in Chinese)

16 徐芳, 李晓轩.跨越科技评价的""马拉河"".中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(8):879-886.

Xu F, Li X X.To cross the Mara river:Thoughts on breakthrough point of research evaluation reform in China.Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017, 32(8):879-886.(in Chinese)

17 李牧南, 周科宇.SCI论文价值的再锚定——兼论如何破解 ""唯论文""的科技评价弊端.情报杂志, 2021, 40(10):179-185.

Li M N, Zhou K Y.Re-anchoring the value of SCI papers and overcoming the defect of ""Only Article"" evaluation.Journal of Intelligence, 2021, 40(10):179-185.(in Chinese)

18 贺艳慧, 李路, 李欣, 等.国内四大核心期刊遴选体系对比分析与研究.图书情报导刊, 2017, (12):53-57.

He Y H, Li L, Li X, et al.Comparative analysis research on the four evaluation system of core journals in China.Journal of Library and Information Science, 2017, (12):53-57.(in Chinese)

19 Chavan M.The balanced scorecard:A new challenge.Journal of Management Development, 2009, 28(5):393-406.

20 徐芳, 李晓轩.科技评价改革十年评述.中国科学院院刊, 2022, 37(5):603-612.

Xu F, Li X X.Review on reform of research evaluation in past decade.Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022, 37(5):603-612.(in Chinese)

21 徐芳, 李晓轩.破""四唯""需要角马理论.中国科技人才, 2021, (1):1-6.

Xu F, Li X X.Breaking the ""Siwei"" needs ""The Theory of Wildebeest"".Chinese Scientific and Technological Talents, 2021, (1):1-6.(in Chinese)"

Download
Request a Copy

Share

COinS