•  
  •  
 

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version)

Keywords

science and technology reform; science and technology innovation; innovation governance; innovation policy; reform trend

Document Type

World Science and Technology Power Construction - Last Ten Years Review and Future Trend of Science and Technology of China - Strategy & Policy Decision Research

Abstract

From the aspects of the macro-governance capability of science and technology (S&T), the mechanism for tackling emerging problems, the life-time career of S&T researchers, the innovation chain of S&T activities, the life cycle of enterprises, innovation players, regional innovation system, and the ecology of S&T innovation, this study systematically reviews the practical exploration and effects of China's S&T reform experience since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC). It also analyzes the latest S&T reforming characteristics in many other innovative countries, such as stronger strategic coordination, broader government intervention, more concern of disruptive innovation and future technology, greater efforts on talent cultivation and introduction, and better balance between the open science and S&T security. Based on these findings, we discuss the future-oriented S&T reforming trends, and provide some new ideas and prospects for establishing a strong country in S&T, and realizing the country's self-reliance and self-improvement in science and technology.

First page

578

Last Page

588

Language

Chinese

Publisher

Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

1 王志刚. 矢志科技自立自强加快建设科技强国. 求是, 2021, (6):21-26.

Wang Z G. Determined to be self-reliant and self-reliant in science and technology, and speed up the construction of a strong country in science and technology. Qiu Shi, 2021, (6):21-26. (in Chinese)

2 樊春良. 国家科技治理体系的理论构架与政策 蕴含. (2022-03-03)[2022-04-07]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1117.g3.20220224.1039.002.html. Fan C L. Theoretical framework and policy implications of national science and technology governance system. (2022-03-03)[2022-04-07]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1117. g3.20220224.1039.002.html. (in Chinese)

3 贺德方, 周华东, 陈涛. 我国科技创新政策体系建设主要进展及对政策方向的思考. 科研管理, 2020, 41(10):81-88.

He D F, Zhou H D, Chen T. Major achievements and development direction in construction of China's science and technology innovation policy system. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(10):81-88. (in Chinese)

4 陈劲, 梁靓, 吴航. 开放式创新背景下产业集聚与创新绩效关系研究——以中国高技术产业为例. 科学学研究, 2013, 31(4):623-629.

Chen J, Liang L, Wu H. Industrial agglomeration and innovation performance under the background of open innovation:evidence from Chinese high-tech industries. Studies in Science of Science, 2013, 31(4):623-629. (in Chinese)

5 方陵生. 美国2021年十大科技政策. 世界科学, 2021, (5):44-46.

Fang L S. Top Ten Science and Technology Policies of the United States in 2021.

World Science, 2021, (5):44-46. (in Chinese)

6 张颀, 彭丽红. 日本综合科技创新会议(CSTI)中的科技外交工具研究. 今日科苑, 2021, (9):39-46.

Zhang Q, Peng L H. Research on S&T diplomacy tools in council for science, technology and innovation (CSTI). Modern Science, 2021, (9):39-46. (in Chinese)

7 樊春良.当前科技发展趋势及各国战略应对述评. 人民论坛·学术前沿, 2019, (24):14-35.

Fan C L. Review of the development trend of science and technology and the strategic response of various countries. Frontiers. 2019, (24):14-35. (in Chinese)

8 Erik Stokstad. After Brexit, U.K. budget offers boost to science. Science, 2020, 367:1291.

9 李研. 后默克尔时代德国科技政策展望. 现代国际关系, 2021, (6):10-17.

Li Y. Prospects of Germany's S&T policy in the post-Merkel era. Contemporary International Relations, 2021, (6):10-17, 59. (in Chinese)

10 郑溪文. 美国疫苗研发搞"曲速行动"是福是祸?. 世界知识, 2020, (18):70.

Zheng X W. Is it a blessing or a curse to engage in "Warp Speed" in vaccine research and development in the United States?. World Affairs, 2020, (18):70. (in Chinese)

11 顾强, 王瑞妍, 董瑞青, 等. 美国到底有没有产业政策?——从《美国先进制造业领导战略》说起. 产业经济评论, 2019, (3):113-124.

Gu Q, Wang R Y, Dong R Q, et al. Does America have an industrial policy at all?-Starting with America's Advanced Manufacturing Leadership Strategy. Review of Industrial Economics. 2019, (3):113-124. (in Chinese)

12 NSTC. The national artificial intelligence research and development strategic plan:2019 update. (2019-06-01)[2022-04-13]. https://www.nitrd.gov/pubs/National-AI-RDStrategy-2019.pdf.

13 程如烟, 王开阳. 美国技术政策新动向浅析. 全球科技经济瞭望, 2022, 37(1):1-7.

Cheng R Y, Wang K Y. Analysis of new trends in American technology policy. Global Science, Technology and Economy Outlook, 2022, 37(1):1-7. (in Chinese)

14 吴丹丹, 钟琪, 王子晨. 典型国家基础研究投入的协调机制比较研究. 中国高校科技, 2016, (5):10-12.

Wu D D, Zhong Q, Wang Z C. A comparative study on the coordination mechanism of basic research investment in typical countries. China University Science & Technology, 2016, (5):10-12. (in Chinese)

15 刘薇禛平. 英首相取消"精英签证"配额将在全球范围内吸引科学、技术人才. 留学, 2019, (16):16.

Liu W Z P. British prime minister cancels "elite visa" quota and will attract scientific and technological talents worldwide. Studying Abroad, 2019, (16):16. (in Chinese)

16 蔡杨. 美国创新与竞争法案对我国有何影响. 网络传播, 2021, (6):72-73.

Cai Y. How does the American Innovation and Competition Act affect my country. New Media, 2021, (6):72-73. (in Chinese)

17 郑思聪. 开放科学将推动数字时代的发现. 科技中国, 2022, (2):102-104.

Zheng S C. Open science will promote discovery in the digital age. Scitech in China, 2022, (2):102-104. (in Chinese)

Share

COinS